不开心
发表于 2025-3-23 10:10:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62245-8 for this argument, and my critique of other writers, to make sense, it is necessary to consider the development of capitalist class relations. This chapter will be a sweeping survey of more than 500 years of English history, one that is premised on an explicit rejection of a number of theoretical o
bourgeois
发表于 2025-3-23 14:23:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1516/151529/151529_12.png
笼子
发表于 2025-3-23 20:43:25
Lecture Notes in Computer Sciencew poor law in 1834 and its implementation in the following decades. I will challenge a number of observations that have been made in the literature by arguing that Speenhamland did not produce a pervasive ‘demoralization’ of the lower classes; that allowances did not keep the poor tied to their pari
olfction
发表于 2025-3-24 01:00:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1516/151529/151529_14.png
秘传
发表于 2025-3-24 06:12:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1516/151529/151529_15.png
amphibian
发表于 2025-3-24 09:21:55
Book 2007This book examines the evolution of public assistance for the poor in England from the late medieval era to the Industrial Revolution. Placing poor relief in the context of the unique class relations of agrarian capitalism, it considers how and why relief in England in the early modern period was distinct.
蒸发
发表于 2025-3-24 14:31:11
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591387early modern period; England; industrial revolution; law; revolution
BARB
发表于 2025-3-24 18:35:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1516/151529/151529_18.png
小歌剧
发表于 2025-3-24 19:53:48
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/151529.jpg
jealousy
发表于 2025-3-25 02:07:31
,Introduction: The Extraordinary Case of a ‘Law to Force Charity’,pe until after c. 1840. In a pamphlet published more than 250 years ago, Thomas Alcock (1752, p. 21) highlighted the exceptional nature of the English case:.The objective of this book is to address an old question: Why was England’s system of poor relief unique, or why, in the words of Alcock, did the English alone have ‘a law to force charity’?