腐蚀
发表于 2025-3-25 04:09:15
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5 of the mode of regulation is itself destabilised and loses its coherence. The model of postwar Fordist growth was not immune to this rule, for its principles, the organisational forms they implied and the employment relations they generated proved increasingly counter-productive (Figure 2.1).
平
发表于 2025-3-25 08:09:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150923/150923_22.png
Omnipotent
发表于 2025-3-25 14:52:03
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5roduction could never be more than a deepening of the scientific organisation of work, the equivalent of the transition from Ford’s model ‘T’ to the annual model change instigated by General Motors (see Figure 6.1). This diagnosis of great continuity is reinforced in countries where nostalgia for Fordism is strong.
ADOPT
发表于 2025-3-25 19:52:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150923/150923_24.png
Integrate
发表于 2025-3-25 20:47:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150923/150923_25.png
猛然一拉
发表于 2025-3-26 01:02:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150923/150923_26.png
slow-wave-sleep
发表于 2025-3-26 05:30:44
What do the Changes Mean?Part I of this book claims that a new production paradigm may be emerging in Japan, Germany and Sweden. This claim can be tempered by showing that the characteristics of the German and Swedish ‘models’ in fact derive from local specificities, and they are particular versions of the same overall model, a model that is still very much alive.
烦忧
发表于 2025-3-26 12:07:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14027-5crisis; production; transformation; transition
清洗
发表于 2025-3-26 15:52:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150923/150923_29.png
暗指
发表于 2025-3-26 18:32:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/16/1510/150923/150923_30.png