cinder
发表于 2025-3-25 07:06:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1458/145762/145762_21.png
匍匐前进
发表于 2025-3-25 08:15:02
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0852-5Lattice; Probability theory; integral transform; measure; real analysis
似少年
发表于 2025-3-25 14:57:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1458/145762/145762_23.png
Bereavement
发表于 2025-3-25 18:23:07
Mathematics and Its Applicationshttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/145762.jpg
大方一点
发表于 2025-3-25 21:49:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1458/145762/145762_25.png
会犯错误
发表于 2025-3-26 03:24:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04513-3is to form μ-equivalence classes by partitioning the set .(ℜ). For arbitrary . ⊃ .), we then associate to . ∈ the μ-equivalence class determined by the restriction of . to .). This choice simplifies matters somewhat when we work with different sets at the same time.
intrude
发表于 2025-3-26 06:12:09
Book 1998analysts, that combines integration and topology. As long as the underlying topological space is reasonably nice (e.g., locally compact with countable basis) the abstract theory and the topological theory yield the same results, but for more compli cated spaces the topological theory gives stronger
浅滩
发表于 2025-3-26 09:22:49
Book 1998 in this book is de fined in such a way that it coincides in the case of Radon measures on Hausdorff spaces with the usual definition in the literature. As a consequence, our integral can differ in the classical case. Our integral, however, is more inclusive. It was defined in the book "C. Constantinescu and K. Weber (in collaboration with A.
蒙太奇
发表于 2025-3-26 14:54:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1458/145762/145762_29.png
uncertain
发表于 2025-3-26 19:53:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1458/145762/145762_30.png