砍伐 发表于 2025-3-26 21:32:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_31.png

愤怒历史 发表于 2025-3-27 01:35:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_32.png

glucagon 发表于 2025-3-27 07:29:17

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_33.png

Freeze 发表于 2025-3-27 12:00:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_34.png

起波澜 发表于 2025-3-27 17:20:56

,Markthalle Martin Elsässer 1911–1914,mentation and manipulation on diagrams in theorematic reasoning has been extensively discussed by logicians and philosophers of science as well as Peirce scholars. It is notable, in particular, that the relationship between theorematic reasoning and abduction has drawn more serious attention.

解决 发表于 2025-3-27 20:38:19

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10280-7is whether it is an instinct or an inference. For many commentators find it paradoxical “that new ideas and hypotheses are products of an instinct (or an insight), and products of an inference at the same time”.

STING 发表于 2025-3-28 01:01:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_37.png

fixed-joint 发表于 2025-3-28 04:37:14

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_38.png

Asseverate 发表于 2025-3-28 06:59:48

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29399-4ld semantics, game-theoretical semantics, dual aspect semantics, extentionalist semantics, conceptual role semantics, discourse representation theory, teleosemantics, and situation semantics, to name a few. Situation semantics, however, seems to have a prominent status among these rival theories.

reaching 发表于 2025-3-28 11:30:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1432/143117/143117_40.png
页: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Abduction in Context; The Conjectural Dyna Woosuk Park Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Diagrammatic Reasoning.Beast-mac