NATTY
发表于 2025-3-23 09:54:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1427/142609/142609_11.png
Chameleon
发表于 2025-3-23 14:24:35
Frederic Fredersdorf,Pascale Rouxad our feelings into their objects.” He calls this “objectification.” (One might also call it “projectivism.”) This Chapter examines the role that the thesis of moral objectification plays in Mackie‘s endeavors to establish moral skepticism. I conclude that his well-known skeptical arguments (from r
任命
发表于 2025-3-23 21:07:01
Pascale Roux,Gerhild Feuersteinon queerness. He calls the argument from queerness “more important” and “more generally applicable” (1977, p. 38), and then he divides this argument into metaphysical and epistemological parts. I subdivide the metaphysical part further into an argument from internalism and an argument from superveni
Myosin
发表于 2025-3-23 23:19:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1427/142609/142609_14.png
Adornment
发表于 2025-3-24 03:02:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1427/142609/142609_15.png
vanquish
发表于 2025-3-24 09:50:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00521-4proach, the Reasons Approach, and the Constitutivist Approach – are outlined and evaluated. It emerges that though the Constitutivist Approach offers the most promising response to Mackie‘s argument, it is difficult to say whether that response is adequate or not.
刚开始
发表于 2025-3-24 13:15:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1427/142609/142609_17.png
你不公正
发表于 2025-3-24 14:57:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1427/142609/142609_18.png
guzzle
发表于 2025-3-24 21:32:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1427/142609/142609_19.png
无政府主义者
发表于 2025-3-25 02:58:35
Anwendungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatikoral judgments, and, in the light of his error theory, that has seemed odd to a lot of folk. Richard Joyce has argued that Mackie‘s approach can be vindicated by a fictionalist account of moral discourse. And Mark Kalderon has argued that moral fictionalism is attractive quite independently of Macki