吊胃口
发表于 2025-3-26 23:53:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142471/142471_31.png
等待
发表于 2025-3-27 01:17:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142471/142471_32.png
微枝末节
发表于 2025-3-27 05:38:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142471/142471_33.png
Cardiac-Output
发表于 2025-3-27 11:51:59
Land Rights, Land Reform, Land Improvement,viz. multi-agent actions. In this chapter we shall be concerned with the conceptual nature, and, especially, the structural aspects of multi-agent actions. Accordingly, we are going to create a conceptual framework of action concepts which relies on the structural (and generational) relationships ho
撤退
发表于 2025-3-27 14:14:15
Craig R. Janes,Ron Stall,Sandra M. Gifford John by shooting him’, ‘John ventilated the room by opening the window’, ‘Tom apologized by sending a bouquet of roses’, and ‘Bob signaled by extending his arm out the car window’. How are we to account for the ‘by’ of method in these statements?
厌烦
发表于 2025-3-27 20:44:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142471/142471_36.png
沙漠
发表于 2025-3-28 01:38:30
Robert A. Rubinstein,Janet D. Perloffl strongly rely on the concept of social norm and on the notion of role definable on the basis of it. Thus we shall begin by a conceptual clarification of social norms. We shall analyze norms partly on the basis of the notion of social practical reasoning investigated in Chapter 7. When speaking of
树胶
发表于 2025-3-28 03:36:15
Craig R. Janes,Ron Stall,Sandra M. Gifforddependent yet closely related “dimensions” and concentrate on them. First, we have the behavioral or . point of view: that an agent’s (observable) actions are somehow related causally or generationally is taken as the basis of a characterization of interaction. Secondly, we have the . or, perhaps be
具体
发表于 2025-3-28 09:46:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142471/142471_39.png
Frequency
发表于 2025-3-28 13:30:36
Robert A. Rubinstein,Janet D. Perloffd to this broad topic. Our account will in part connect with the purposive-causal theory of social action developed in this book and hence emphasize the agents’ causal action propensities. In addition, we shall also emphasize that the explanation of social action can be handled within the pragmatic