cerebral-cortex
发表于 2025-3-21 16:17:59
书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Theory of Philosophical Fallacies读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0142464<br><br> <br><br>
FLAGR
发表于 2025-3-21 20:34:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142464/142464_2.png
Morphine
发表于 2025-3-22 01:45:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142464/142464_3.png
Femish
发表于 2025-3-22 05:30:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142464/142464_4.png
欺骗世家
发表于 2025-3-22 11:11:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142464/142464_5.png
Neutral-Spine
发表于 2025-3-22 13:40:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142464/142464_6.png
flavonoids
发表于 2025-3-22 17:28:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142464/142464_7.png
dysphagia
发表于 2025-3-23 00:54:32
The Eocene Origin of Anthropoid Primates, as Schleiermacher and famous logicians such as Lotze, Sigwart and Trendelenburg were guilty of such lack of understanding but can be refuted by showing that they confused a concept with its extension, thereby falling into a kind of logicism.
乳汁
发表于 2025-3-23 05:03:12
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137513441ophical concepts are already in place before we begin philosophising, so that any attempt at defining them ends up in concept-swapping, i.e. replacing the original concept with a different and arbitrary one. Whenever philosophers do that, they equivocate. This fallacy is often compounded with circular definitions.
Interlocking
发表于 2025-3-23 08:00:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8873-7 philosophical fallacies. That theory says that the peculiar nature of philosophical thinking repeatedly leads people to take ordinary concepts with great philosophical import, such as causality or duty, and replace them with new, made-up ones, whose content is very different from that of the origin