芦笋 发表于 2025-3-23 12:03:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142455/142455_11.pngObstreperous 发表于 2025-3-23 14:58:35
,Messung von Fußpunktwiderständen,ific societal conditions for the satisfaction of both needs. But we have not been concerned with the moral issue of whether people’s needs . be met. Not everyone accepts that they have an obligation to aid those in serious need. Without such a moral theory we can only preach to the converted. This iCHECK 发表于 2025-3-23 18:51:10
,Messung von Fußpunktwiderständen,yet out of the relativist wood. There may be little consensus over which strategies best achieve this goal and/or, whether or not it can be reconciled with other aims and beliefs. Human history has created so many different patterns of production, reproduction, communication and government that view进步 发表于 2025-3-23 22:22:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68292-6ugh time. We also recognised that these needs are met by innumerable specific satisfiers, which do vary across cultures. Here, we must again address the many problems which flow from this duality of universality and particularity. Can we articulate what physical health and autonomy mean in terms whi改正 发表于 2025-3-24 03:20:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142455/142455_15.png幼稚 发表于 2025-3-24 10:35:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142455/142455_16.pngGUILE 发表于 2025-3-24 12:30:02
Arthroscopic Assessment of Partial ACL Tearsnto specific positive rights — how rights to need-satisfaction can be specified and delivered, and how our procedural preconditions for rational deliberation can be approximated in real-world political processes and institutions. Only then can we evaluate how closely different societies approximateInfelicity 发表于 2025-3-24 16:52:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142455/142455_18.pnginfelicitous 发表于 2025-3-24 21:29:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1425/142455/142455_19.pngInclement 发表于 2025-3-25 03:13:59
Atul F. Kamath,Linsen T. Samuels political organisation. If human needs have strict priority over other political goals, then all people have the right to optimal need-satisfaction based on the best available knowledge. Such a view might seem to support the authority of experts. However, we have seen that appropriate and effectiv