PLY
发表于 2025-3-21 18:39:27
书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>书目名称A Social Epistemology of Research Groups读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0142203<br><br> <br><br>
eucalyptus
发表于 2025-3-21 20:39:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1423/142203/142203_2.png
外向者
发表于 2025-3-22 03:46:46
Book 2016ook includes field observations and interviews with scientists to present an empirically-grounded perspective on much-debated questions concerning research groups’ division of labor, relations of epistemic dependence and trust..
locus-ceruleus
发表于 2025-3-22 08:11:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1423/142203/142203_4.png
OFF
发表于 2025-3-22 12:36:09
2947-6828to integrating philosophical analysis with first-hand quali.This book investigates how collaborative scientific practice yields scientific knowledge. At a time when most of today’s scientific knowledge is created in research groups, the author reconsiders the social character of science to address
协迫
发表于 2025-3-22 15:08:12
Komplexe Zahlen und Funktionen,temological approach to the division of labor in groups need to take into account? To answer these two questions, I begin by revisiting social epistemology’s existing discussion about the division of labor in science, a discussion primarily focused on scientific peer communities (Sect. .).
裙带关系
发表于 2025-3-22 20:38:07
Vektoralgebra und analytische Geometrie,to be domain-specific. After all, what applies to interactions between children or friends in non-professional everyday life need not apply to the professional interaction between scientists who collaborate to create scientific knowledge.
optic-nerve
发表于 2025-3-22 21:41:48
Book 2016ted in research groups, the author reconsiders the social character of science to address the question of whether collaboratively created knowledge should be considered as collective achievement, and if so, in which sense. Combining philosophical analysis with qualitative empirical inquiry, this boo
Spangle
发表于 2025-3-23 01:31:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1423/142203/142203_9.png
milligram
发表于 2025-3-23 07:13:22
Komplexe Zahlen und Funktionen,p members, following them through their professional days. When I had familiarized myself with the group, I set out to interview the five scientists that formed the group’s core at the time of my investigation.