宣称 发表于 2025-3-26 23:37:50
,Cauldron of Genes (130–70 Ka),ationship between philosophy and science. Non-Philosophy provides the philo-fiction that allows us to treat these discursive fields as simple material, as an occasion for thought that is autonomous but foreclosed from the Real and this realization is liberating for thought as it breaks the transcendExposition 发表于 2025-3-27 02:24:17
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95667-7 engaging in the non-philosophical project rather than simply a theological one. To answer that question I must first address Laruelle’s own work on religion, which has been the dominant material of Philosophy IV and the source of a number of central concepts such as heresy. But additionally I mustdisciplined 发表于 2025-3-27 08:11:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1417/141601/141601_33.pngWITH 发表于 2025-3-27 10:17:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1417/141601/141601_34.png祖先 发表于 2025-3-27 13:57:40
Decision Boundaries in Feature Space, “good name” (as Derrida said of God). The reason nature remains a good name is, in part, because of its ability to confound philosophical thinking, but there is always the risk that this confusion be wielded as a weapon against human beings and other creatures. Morton and Latour, in similar ways, aExpressly 发表于 2025-3-27 18:44:04
Some classes of point-line geometries,f naturalism developed from ecology rather than from empiricism, but a form of nature that breaks with these sorts of philosophical and theological humiliations of the creatural and instead becomes something of use to creatures. As we said in the last chapter, ecology without nature, by all means, babracadabra 发表于 2025-3-27 21:55:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1417/141601/141601_37.pnghemoglobin 发表于 2025-3-28 02:21:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1417/141601/141601_38.pngMAG 发表于 2025-3-28 09:45:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1417/141601/141601_39.pngfolliculitis 发表于 2025-3-28 13:06:06
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137331977ecology; ecosystem; environment; theology