nonplus
发表于 2025-3-23 13:47:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75340-5e? Should we explain the process and progress of science? Should we study the knowledge claims offered by scientists and decide which of these are so-called “scientific” knowledge claims? Should we study the history of science and its influence on current scientific practice? What — if anything — sh
Fabric
发表于 2025-3-23 17:27:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-06543-1ed by the advocates of the statement account of science seems to imply that model-theoretic realism might overlap with their views also in other ways. Well, for one thing, a defender of model-theoretic account of science also looks to a semantic analysis of scientific language to fulfil her goals. D
chandel
发表于 2025-3-23 18:42:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1415/141443/141443_13.png
六边形
发表于 2025-3-23 22:41:01
The International Context for US Security, in the non-statement context where mostly we find various forms of anti-realism, except when the notion of truth is addressed in terms of truthlikeness, such as in Niiniluoto’s case. No examination of the nature of scientific theories can be complete without addressing the relations between these t
Arctic
发表于 2025-3-24 03:49:46
Emma RuttkampIncludes supplementary material:
易怒
发表于 2025-3-24 07:05:18
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/141443.jpg
single
发表于 2025-3-24 12:58:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1415/141443/141443_17.png
CLAMP
发表于 2025-3-24 16:33:38
0166-6991 igm in the philosophy of science. Within this paradigm she gives an account of sciences as process and product. She expounds the "received statement" and the "non-statement" views of science, and shows how the model-theoretic approach resolves the spurious tension between these views. In this endeav
Insul岛
发表于 2025-3-24 22:35:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1415/141443/141443_19.png
受伤
发表于 2025-3-25 02:33:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75340-5e theory are satisfied (i.e., in which the sentences are “true”). Model theory was initially developed for explicitly constructed formal languages with the purpose of studying certain mathematical issues, until Evert Beth and others initiated the application of model theory to semantic analyses of so-called “empirical” scientific theories..