疲惫的老马 发表于 2025-3-23 11:27:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78411-8appointment and corporate governance. As well as suggesting specific changes to the draft legislative provisions, the conclusions recommend a wider debate on both (a) Officers of Parliament as a distinct unit of our constitutional watchdogs and (b) best practice in corporate governance in the ombudsman sector.讥讽 发表于 2025-3-23 15:49:27
Book 2020h such reformative legislation can be designed. In pursuing this goal, this edited collection represents an academic response to a challenge laid down by the current Parliamentary Ombudsman in February 2018, at a .JUSTICE. event. It draws on the original research of the authors and bases its proposaetidronate 发表于 2025-3-23 20:48:12
Richard Kirkham,Chris GillSeeks to influence the legislative debate around ombudsman reform.Draws on the contributions from a workshop in Sheffield.Outlines the design of ombudsman that could be establishedintercede 发表于 2025-3-24 01:21:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1414/141382/141382_14.png远足 发表于 2025-3-24 05:21:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1414/141382/141382_15.pngCARE 发表于 2025-3-24 06:54:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1414/141382/141382_16.pnginhibit 发表于 2025-3-24 14:31:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1414/141382/141382_17.pngcommensurate 发表于 2025-3-24 16:48:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-05173-8 other, it argues for reverting back to a standalone Parliamentary Ombud for UK-wide public services. In reaching this conclusion, the chapter sets out seven jurisdiction-based principles for reform. When assessed against these principles, the current draft Public Services Ombudsman Bill has a numbe流浪 发表于 2025-3-24 19:22:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1414/141382/141382_19.pngFavorable 发表于 2025-3-24 23:43:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1414/141382/141382_20.png