febrile
发表于 2025-3-23 10:21:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xproaches to metaphor see metaphor as a form of language that is characterized by deviance from a literal standard, both relevance theory and cognitive linguistics do not support this position and view metaphor as a ubiquitous part of both ordinary language use and everyday cognition.
Hyperlipidemia
发表于 2025-3-23 17:18:52
http://image.papertrans.cn/a/image/141270.jpg
Monolithic
发表于 2025-3-23 21:17:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1413/141270/141270_13.png
antidote
发表于 2025-3-23 23:57:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1413/141270/141270_14.png
Cabg318
发表于 2025-3-24 04:26:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xit has not always been easy to reconcile these theoretical frameworks with each other. However, I hope that I have successfully demonstrated that there is a huge potential in working on topics in a non-dogmatic way rather than staying within the confines of a single framework.
chalice
发表于 2025-3-24 06:48:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1413/141270/141270_16.png
江湖骗子
发表于 2025-3-24 10:41:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31251-Xin either of the theories. Such a hybrid theory seems to be especially valuable as it has become obvious that metaphor scholars struggle with the deficiencies of each theory, and some begin to understand that both perspectives have something very important to contribute towards a comprehensive, cognitive theory of metaphor.
匍匐前进
发表于 2025-3-24 15:00:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1413/141270/141270_18.png
骗子
发表于 2025-3-24 22:55:24
Cognitive Linguistics and Metaphor,ichte nicht nur ge macht, sondern erzählt, umgeschrieben und erweitert. Zwi schen uns und anderen ist Raum, einander zu verstehen und uns aufeinander im Kontext einer gemeinsamen Geschichte zu beziehen. Das ermöglicht ein Verstehen von Schuld aber auch von Wiedergutmachung und Versöhnung. In diese
Cognizance
发表于 2025-3-25 00:27:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1413/141270/141270_20.png