languid 发表于 2025-3-28 17:18:16

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141079/141079_41.png

Inclement 发表于 2025-3-28 19:47:39

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141079/141079_42.png

ANTIC 发表于 2025-3-29 01:42:35

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141079/141079_43.png

elucidate 发表于 2025-3-29 05:28:02

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141079/141079_44.png

Factual 发表于 2025-3-29 09:52:38

http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141079/141079_45.png

assent 发表于 2025-3-29 13:08:52

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06391-1have to be conceived as infallible (and so as requiring unrevisability as Quine requires a priori knowledge to do), and second that the scope of revision of items of a priori knowledge (i.e. of a priori warrants and a priori statements) might include empirical revision.
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: A Historical and Systematic Perspective on A Priori Knowledge and Justification; Ivette Fred-Rivera Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable