初学者
发表于 2025-3-25 05:39:42
Andrzej Lingas,Mia Persson,Dzmitry SledneuThis chapter starts with the origin and the design process of the research question, discusses the definition of legal tradition and ends with the state of research.
相一致
发表于 2025-3-25 11:08:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141078/141078_22.png
消息灵通
发表于 2025-3-25 12:38:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67899-9In concluding this book, this chapter reflects on the historical and legal comparison of the two maxims, points out the achievements and limitations of this study, and evaluates the two maxims against a historical background.
新星
发表于 2025-3-25 18:31:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141078/141078_24.png
流利圆滑
发表于 2025-3-25 21:00:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141078/141078_25.png
Diatribe
发表于 2025-3-26 00:27:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95018-7al and political principles are important. Quod Omnes Tangit and Tianxia Wei Gong are such principles. The second methodological question is the possibility of studying legal and political ideas through history, in other words, if such research is possible or reliable, touching upon the concept of a
鞭子
发表于 2025-3-26 06:54:45
Some Position Problems for Graphse inner methodology, and the difference lies in the communication canal of these two maxims. Then comes the development process of the two maxims in history. This chapter examines whether both of the maxims experienced the process of from ius privatum to ius publicum, from ius naturale to ius positi
Conscientious
发表于 2025-3-26 11:35:09
A Historical and Legal Comparison between Tianxia Wei Gong and Quod Omnes Tangit978-3-031-46467-6Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
clarify
发表于 2025-3-26 12:53:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141078/141078_29.png
ALERT
发表于 2025-3-26 18:05:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1411/141078/141078_30.png