花费
发表于 2025-3-26 21:26:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1410/140981/140981_31.png
debris
发表于 2025-3-27 04:47:57
Original brown-peterson spectra,ch person has the task of recognizing his or her “right” time to die when it arrives. Furthermore, they believe in a “right” way to die, encompassing four domains: the physical, the psychological, the social, and the spiritual. Health professionals who provide end-of-life care should try to implement each patient’s wishes in those domains.
贸易
发表于 2025-3-27 08:27:45
Henry S. PerkinsAuthors are experts in bioethics, medical anthropology and cross-cultural spiritual beliefs, but are rooted in a clinical medical background.Tips for real life application are contained in every chapt
Fecundity
发表于 2025-3-27 09:46:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1410/140981/140981_34.png
事情
发表于 2025-3-27 14:52:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1410/140981/140981_35.png
glamor
发表于 2025-3-27 19:54:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1410/140981/140981_36.png
内部
发表于 2025-3-28 01:43:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1410/140981/140981_37.png
动作谜
发表于 2025-3-28 04:16:08
Classes caracteristiques lagrangiennes,, partial or full, over treatment decisions, and only a few patients say they want to maintain sole doctor control. Patient autonomy has, therefore, become medicine’s dominant decision-making ethic, making patient assessments of treatments critically important in end-of-life care.
inculpate
发表于 2025-3-28 07:38:34
Algebraic Topology. Göttingen 1984ke in decision-making? When should aggressive, potentially curative treatments be used? How should their outcomes be evaluated? Should the patient ever enter clinical research trials? When should purely comfort measures begin? and Where does the patient want to die?
frozen-shoulder
发表于 2025-3-28 12:43:45
Algebraic Topology. Göttingen 1984 make decisions for these patients. To do so, proxies typically use one of three methods—the “purely” subjective method, the substituted judgment method, or the best interests method. I, however, favor a fourth decision-making method, the constructive judgment method, for its grounding in the patient’s life story and wide applicability.