synchronous
发表于 2025-3-28 17:14:18
Joseph Olayinka Fashagba,Edward R. McMahonht .-module (we speak of “.-modules” instead of “ℤ.-modules”). In developing the theory we shall attempt to deduce as much as possible from general properties of derived functors. Thus, for example, we shall give a proof of the fact that .(.) classifies extensions which is not based on a particular (i.e. standard) resolution.
Immortal
发表于 2025-3-28 21:19:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140474/140474_42.png
伙伴
发表于 2025-3-29 01:57:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140474/140474_43.png
易发怒
发表于 2025-3-29 03:29:36
Alexander Malogolovkin,Alexey Sereda depth of these developments, we have selected a number of different topics and describe some of the main applications and results. Naturally, the treatments are somewhat cursory, the intention being to give the flavor of the homological methods rather than the details of the arguments and results.
Antigen
发表于 2025-3-29 10:22:06
African Spirituality and Ethicsl, and important, procedure. Our objective in this chapter is to establish the appropriate mathematical language for the general description of mathematical systems and of mappings of systems, insofar as that language is applicable to homological algebra.
Connotation
发表于 2025-3-29 15:18:48
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137523341 by Baer . It turns out that this group .(.) is naturally isomorphic to a group Ext.(.) obtained from . and . by the characteristic, indeed prototypical, methods of homological algebra. To be precise, Ext.(.) is the value of the . functor of Hom.(−, .) on the module ., in the sense of Chapter IV.