ILEUM
发表于 2025-3-23 11:33:38
Laure LansariRe-examines the class of discourse makers from an epistemological standpoint, highlighting the divergences between the French enunciative tradition and the English pragmatic tradition.Investigates how
傻
发表于 2025-3-23 16:08:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140424/140424_12.png
别炫耀
发表于 2025-3-23 20:42:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140424/140424_13.png
善辩
发表于 2025-3-23 23:57:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140424/140424_14.png
Maximize
发表于 2025-3-24 06:18:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140424/140424_15.png
安定
发表于 2025-3-24 08:20:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140424/140424_16.png
极小
发表于 2025-3-24 12:39:51
Awareness in Consumers About Sustainabilityhe different levels of analysis: semantic-pragmatic, syntactic and collocational. The overall results show that the four DMs have one pragmatic function in common—metalinguistic comment—which is not surprising for DMs of .. Despite this common feature, many divergences appear: first, some of the DMs
有权
发表于 2025-3-24 16:25:47
Access to Energy at the Household Leveltic and collocational parameters. On the basis of these findings, it is clear that . and . share striking similarities. Both are specialised in one discourse function: metalinguistic comment, whereby the speaker comments upon his/her own linguistic choices and mitigates his/her commitment to these c
PRO
发表于 2025-3-24 19:12:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1405/140424/140424_19.png
碌碌之人
发表于 2025-3-25 00:06:40
Analytical Systemization of Structures for the study. The data shows that all four DMs have undergone pragmaticalisation, developing new discourse functions that correlate with new syntactic features, but it also suggests that the nature and degree of pragmaticalisation is different for each DM. Secondly, this conclusive chapter seeks t