CRAMP
发表于 2025-3-23 12:29:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1401/140074/140074_11.png
ornithology
发表于 2025-3-23 14:03:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1401/140074/140074_12.png
兽皮
发表于 2025-3-23 18:01:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41691-5 competition,” while lacking egregiously, in descriptiveness, were acceptable devices for analyses, especially if they eased analyses and if the predictions drawn from the models past repeated empirical tests. Neither Robbins nor Friedman made the economy within the human brain a central issue.
相同
发表于 2025-3-23 23:42:05
Yongjia Zhou,Qing Xue,Jia Hao,Min-xia Liu the unifying core concern. Gary Becker, George Stigler, and many other economists have since the 1960s argued that economics is a “method of analysis” that can be applied without regard to past disciplinary boundaries.
BOAST
发表于 2025-3-24 03:50:48
Chuanyu Zou,Na Lin,Yunhong Zhangwithin psychology, which he considered a lesser discipline. He also opined against laboratory experimentation, because laboratories were artificial environments, intentionally so, for developing economic generalizations.
音乐学者
发表于 2025-3-24 09:50:34
Chuanyu Zou,Na Lin,Yunhong Zhangcal economics, grounded in contemporary times (but not in earlier eras) in perfect rationality. A growing cadre of behavioral economists have gone further, concluding that people are so frequently “irrational” that they are “predictably irrational,” suggesting that neoclassical economists should fold their analytical efforts.
CAPE
发表于 2025-3-24 14:36:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1401/140074/140074_17.png
时间等
发表于 2025-3-24 18:23:23
Book 2018rom economists in Robbins’s time to today—no longer can generate general consent among economists. Since Robbins’ .Essay., economists have learned more than Robbins and his cohorts could have imagined about human decision making and about the human brain that is the lynchpin of human decision making
长处
发表于 2025-3-24 19:15:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/15/1401/140074/140074_19.png
Little
发表于 2025-3-24 23:19:54
Richard B. McKenziePresents an innovative way of considering how best to understand economics: the brain-focused approach to scarcity.Unifies behavioral inductive findings with neoclassical deductive methods.Provides a