interference 发表于 2025-3-28 16:22:28
,Gauss (Schweikart and Taurinus) and Gauss’s Differential Geometry,er consequences of Saccheri’s and Lambert’s ideas, which Gauss accepted and improved. Schweikart’s nephew, Franz Adolf Taurinus, however, used a lengthy inverstigation as the basis for a fallacious refutation of the new geometry, and Gauss refused to be associated with his work. As for what Gauss knEntropion 发表于 2025-3-28 21:46:54
,János Bolyai,y accepted the idea of a new geometry and published it as a 24-page appendix to his father’s two-volume work on geometry in 1832. The content of this remarkable 24-page essay is described, noting the importance of the study of three-dimensional geometry (without which there can be no claim that theStatins 发表于 2025-3-29 01:21:25
Lobachevskii,started by 1830 to publish accounts of his new geometry. This early essay is looked at briefly: it derives the crucial trigonometric formulae from a consideration of the intrinsic differential geometry of the new geometry. This work is seldom described in recent histories of mathematics. Lobachevski熔岩 发表于 2025-3-29 04:06:42
Publication and Non-Reception up to 1855,n it, but made no connection to non-Euclidean geometry. In the 1840s the Bolyais found out about Lobachevskii’s work, which they generally liked, but they did not get in touch with him. The most notable contact was Gauss’s reply to the Appendix written by János Bolyai, where Gauss famously claimed t水土 发表于 2025-3-29 07:16:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10313/1031228/1031228_45.pngMunificent 发表于 2025-3-29 13:32:04
,Plücker, Hesse, Higher Plane Curves, and the Resolution of the Duality Paradox,esolved for such curves. The paradox is that a curve of degree . will seemingly have a dual of degree .(.−1) that will in its turn have a dual of degree .(.−1)(.(.−1)−1). But by duality the dual of the dual of a curve must be the original curve, which forces .(.−1)(.(.−1)−1)=., an equation that is pDeference 发表于 2025-3-29 15:48:04
Riemann: Geometry and Physics,complex functions and in geometry. He argued that geometry can be studied in any setting where one may speak of lengths and angles. Typically this meant differential geometry but in a space of any arbitrary number of dimensions and with an arbitrary (positive definite) metric. Such a geometry was inEulogy 发表于 2025-3-29 22:56:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10313/1031228/1031228_48.pngDiatribe 发表于 2025-3-30 01:54:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10313/1031228/1031228_49.png在驾驶 发表于 2025-3-30 05:32:56
,Poncelet’s ,,ed the algebraic remedy offered by Cauchy, and the final book retains those ideas. This shows the strength of Poncelet’s belief in the importance of simple general ideas in geometry which could match those of algebra.