密切关系
发表于 2025-3-23 12:48:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10308/1030752/1030752_11.png
文字
发表于 2025-3-23 14:02:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10308/1030752/1030752_12.png
intelligible
发表于 2025-3-23 21:56:37
D. D. Devlineometric conditions that emerge from the above analysis show roughly that the basic theorem holds when the approximate telluroid . used for the linearization has a maximum inclination of 60. with respect to the vertical and the coefficients of the first 12 degrees are also provided as data.
停止偿付
发表于 2025-3-23 22:55:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10308/1030752/1030752_14.png
恫吓
发表于 2025-3-24 03:32:17
The Poem as Epitaph,of novelty to things of every day.”. In Chapter 22 Coleridge lists what he considers to be Wordsworth’s characteristic defects and excellences. These opposing lists are sometimes taken as the source of the “Two Voices” theory of Wordsworth’s poetry:
ligature
发表于 2025-3-24 09:33:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10308/1030752/1030752_16.png
abstemious
发表于 2025-3-24 14:32:29
The Poet in Search of a Public,e considered the most suitable for poetry. The words were spoken some twenty or thirty years after Wordsworth’s death by an old man who had at one time been a gardener’s boy at Rydal Mount, and they were quoted in a paper read to the Wordsworth Society by H. D. Rawnsley in 1882.. They make clear, wi
抱狗不敢前
发表于 2025-3-24 15:56:41
The Poet in Search of a Poem,e subject as it is in Nature and in fact would be enough to make a poem, and that the poet “will feel that there is no necessity to trick out or elevate nature”; and at the same time he steadily saw the poet as artist and his poems as made things, the result of craft, workmanship and “long and deep
GULP
发表于 2025-3-24 19:13:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/104/10308/1030752/1030752_19.png
Gingivitis
发表于 2025-3-25 01:07:31
The Poet in Search of a Poem,te nature”; and at the same time he steadily saw the poet as artist and his poems as made things, the result of craft, workmanship and “long and deep thinking”. He saw little in recent literature to persuade him that the task of resolving such opposite views of poetry would be an easy one. “In historical terms,” say Professor Lindenberger,