Sputum 发表于 2025-3-23 10:30:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_11.png使成核 发表于 2025-3-23 15:38:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_12.pngCURB 发表于 2025-3-23 19:45:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_13.png停止偿付 发表于 2025-3-24 00:14:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_14.pngBRAWL 发表于 2025-3-24 03:57:37
Birmingham, Birmingham papers’ pride and affection for the Chamberlain family. The way the Birmingham papers reported on Churchill changed over time as his position and that of Neville Chamberlain changed. They compared Churchill with Chamberlain through the nature of their leadership, with Churchill portrayed止痛药 发表于 2025-3-24 06:59:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_16.pngPAN 发表于 2025-3-24 11:43:48
Conclusion,ewspapers’ relationships with politicians. It concludes that the press reporting of Churchill broadly agreed that he was a great man, but this outlook was often mediated by the experience of each city and by national and regional identities. It argues that despite all the criticisms, as seen in thePANIC 发表于 2025-3-24 15:16:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_18.pngchapel 发表于 2025-3-24 20:00:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10289/1028870/1028870_19.png不要不诚实 发表于 2025-3-25 02:52:28
North England,o shows that the Manchester and Leeds newspapers did not express distinctive regional identities when reporting on Churchill. The absence of territorially distinct Churchill coverage may be because, unlike in other parts of the UK, their identities had not been challenged by Churchill and his family in the past.