Between
发表于 2025-3-26 21:40:25
Evil: From Phenomenology to ThoughtTo think of being inclines metaxological philosophy to ponder the goodness of being. In his chapter, Cyril O’Regan engages the various notes on evil throughout metaxological philosophy. His argument is that Desmond’s view of evil comes close to Ricoeur in ., where symbols of evil give philosophy to think about the excessive nature of evil.
pacifist
发表于 2025-3-27 05:07:02
Panentheism and Hegelian ControversiesPhilip Gottschalk carries this discussion one step further, engaging similar authors, but adding the dimension of Desmond’s ‘clash’ with other, slightly more pious, Hegelians.
pester
发表于 2025-3-27 06:31:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10287/1028648/1028648_33.png
exacerbate
发表于 2025-3-27 11:51:03
978-3-030-07554-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer International P
indicate
发表于 2025-3-27 15:42:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10287/1028648/1028648_35.png
使高兴
发表于 2025-3-27 17:45:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10287/1028648/1028648_36.png
flamboyant
发表于 2025-3-28 01:02:54
Retrieving the Primal Ethos of Life: (Bio)Ethics in the Love of Beingd goodness imply for discussions in bioethics? Roberto Dell’Oro argues that contemporary bioethics would benefit from a metaxological reappreciation of the goodness of being, and especially the value of givenness.
只有
发表于 2025-3-28 04:28:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10287/1028648/1028648_38.png
CODA
发表于 2025-3-28 07:52:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10287/1028648/1028648_39.png
MITE
发表于 2025-3-28 12:25:57
Transcendence in Metaxology and Sophiologyov and Solov’ëv. In discussion with Desmond’s discussion of these authors in . Josephien van Kessel proposes that there is far greater similarity between the Sophiology of Solov’ëv (and Bulgakov) and Desmond’s metaxology.