四海为家的人 发表于 2025-3-23 13:00:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10282/1028125/1028125_11.pngELATE 发表于 2025-3-23 17:19:19
inoza, Locke, and Rawls.Written in an accessible style for s.In .Why Do Religious Forms Matter?., Pooyan Tamimi Arab. .reflects on the Early Modern roots and contemporary relevance of a materialist perspective on the politics of religious diversity..Taking as a starting point the insight that religiTAIN 发表于 2025-3-23 18:18:29
Introduction: What Is a Religious Form?, of discourse are part of the analysis. These diverse religious forms—from buildings, images, and food to discourses—manifest in “domains,” which are private and public spaces whose existence depends on how political conceptions of justice are applied.Constant 发表于 2025-3-23 23:08:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10282/1028125/1028125_14.pngOrgasm 发表于 2025-3-24 06:13:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10282/1028125/1028125_15.png悠然 发表于 2025-3-24 09:38:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10282/1028125/1028125_16.pngFLAX 发表于 2025-3-24 14:39:09
Spinoza: Arch-Father of the Material-Religion Approach,analysis of human affects, and the Enlightenment philosopher’s critique of religious, imaginative, meaning-making practices. Spinoza’s theoretization of diverse material-religious forms—visions, books, rituals, buildings—is highlighted by turning the approach toward his philosophy itself. The focusmyocardium 发表于 2025-3-24 18:23:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10282/1028125/1028125_18.png借喻 发表于 2025-3-24 20:48:44
Rawls: Religious Forms and Public Reason,s misinterprets Rawls’s proviso for comprehensive doctrines’ participation in public political life by insisting that religious discourses should be translated into secular equivalents. The overlapping consensus that citizens holding diverse doctrines reach by exercising public reason is related to有其法作用 发表于 2025-3-25 00:24:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10282/1028125/1028125_20.png