起来了 发表于 2025-3-23 11:45:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_11.pngAbjure 发表于 2025-3-23 17:24:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_12.png恫吓 发表于 2025-3-23 19:37:56
EU Debates in National Arenas integration and immigration. This chapter aims to compare the strategies adopted by mainstream and populist parties to compete on EU issues in national parliaments. The analysis reveals that support for the EU is no longer unconditional, even for mainstream left parties of both countries, which cri使害羞 发表于 2025-3-23 23:21:03
Debating Immigration and the EU in the EP were the net winner of the elections. Thus, the EP became a privileged platform for Eurosceptic parties. This chapter compares the positions on immigration and European affairs endorsed by the Italian and British MEPs, in a context of increasing politicization of both issues. The empirical analysisHIKE 发表于 2025-3-24 05:36:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_15.png表否定 发表于 2025-3-24 09:52:50
Book 2021 book uses the case studies of Italy, the UK, and the EP to study party positioning specifically towards immigration and the European Union, to understand to what extent mainstream-left, mainstream-right and populist parties adopt different framing strategies to compete on the new cultural dimensionterazosin 发表于 2025-3-24 14:06:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_17.png防水 发表于 2025-3-24 15:44:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_18.pngpacifist 发表于 2025-3-24 19:51:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_19.pngjungle 发表于 2025-3-25 03:11:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10280/1027921/1027921_20.png