拍下盗公款
发表于 2025-3-23 13:12:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10279/1027886/1027886_11.png
Ferritin
发表于 2025-3-23 14:04:24
Extreme Groups Propaganda War Under a Free Speech Lens: The Unwinnable Battle,provided the speaker does not call for violence nor does he allude to individuals by names to be attacked. Glorifying Jihad or advocating for Sharia law to advance the interest of any group is strictly prohibited.
sorbitol
发表于 2025-3-23 21:36:07
Book 2018initiatives to curb the surge of online extreme speech, such as Google’s “Redirect Method” or the U.S. State Department’s campaign called “Think Again.” The volume concludes by outlining a number of promising technical approaches that can potently empower tech companies to reduce religious extremist groups’ presence and impact on social media..
充气球
发表于 2025-3-24 00:36:03
Who Speaks for Islam? Extreme Religious Groups, the Exception that Proves the Rule,fy the use of violent means to achieve their “political” ambitions. Treatment of civilians is a notable example where radical scholars have effectively re-written their own ideologically based rules of war to justify atrocities against innocent population.
tenuous
发表于 2025-3-24 03:49:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10279/1027886/1027886_15.png
GRATE
发表于 2025-3-24 07:01:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10279/1027886/1027886_16.png
exophthalmos
发表于 2025-3-24 12:58:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10279/1027886/1027886_17.png
表示向下
发表于 2025-3-24 16:12:03
Extreme Groups Propaganda War Under a Free Speech Lens: The Unwinnable Battle,at, in the United States, criminalizing pro-Jihad propaganda materials that “merely” advocate for the use of violence is likely to be deemed “unconstitutional”. The case law of the European Court on Human Rights, by contrast, permits advocacy for Sharia law and for the establishment of a caliphate,
NAG
发表于 2025-3-24 19:28:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10279/1027886/1027886_19.png
马笼头
发表于 2025-3-24 23:52:17
Book 2018laws regulating these grey areas of Jihadi propaganda activities. The authors investigate the use of religion to advance political agendas and the legal challenges involved with balancing regulation with free speech rights. The project also examines the reasons behind the limited success of leading