Matrimony
发表于 2025-3-23 11:26:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10278/1027723/1027723_11.png
机械
发表于 2025-3-23 14:06:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10278/1027723/1027723_12.png
deciduous
发表于 2025-3-23 21:15:11
Fictitious Empiricism, Material Experiments. Conditions for Thinking the Enlightenment “Issue of Emp thought: observation became the new watchword for naturalists, just as experiment had been for those from the experimental sciences—physics, chemistry, physiology—who had previously relied both on observation and experimentation, and, eventually, (4) empiricism, as a technical term, started to be u
观察
发表于 2025-3-24 00:36:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10278/1027723/1027723_14.png
daredevil
发表于 2025-3-24 03:25:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10278/1027723/1027723_15.png
padding
发表于 2025-3-24 09:00:21
Buffon’s Natural History: The Catalogue of Facts and the Temptation of Systemre knowledge constitutes a set of interrelated data, rather than the . of singular observations. According to Buffon in 1783 (., Du fer), the best . is the presentation of the relations (.) discovered by means of comparison. I claim that this definition is not a paradoxical statement by a senile old
疾驰
发表于 2025-3-24 11:57:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10278/1027723/1027723_17.png
军械库
发表于 2025-3-24 17:20:01
Empiricism and Certainty in Science: The Franco-Berlin School of Empiricismich also originate in the .. The reference to Buffon and D’Alembert serves to support the author’s fundamental thesis that the concept of applying one science to another has been at the heart of Enlightenment’s epistemological empiricism. Advancing an original point of view, Charrak argues that char
启发
发表于 2025-3-24 21:25:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10278/1027723/1027723_19.png
不能约
发表于 2025-3-25 02:22:52
From Locke to Materialism: Empiricism, the Brain and the Stirrings of Ontology010b). Rather, Locke says quite directly if we pay heed to such passages, “Our Business here is not to know all things, but those which concern our Conduct” (., I.i.6). There would be more to say here about what this implies for our understanding of empiricism (see Norton 1981; Gaukroger 2005), but