600
发表于 2025-3-23 12:02:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1027/102699/102699_11.png
文艺
发表于 2025-3-23 15:28:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1027/102699/102699_12.png
挑剔小责
发表于 2025-3-23 19:50:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71434-5in whom the poetry of life runs deep but whose channels of expression have been dammed by the society in which she lives, in whom idealism burns with a hard gem-like flame but which — thwarted by her status in the world — can only burn itself and others in an agony of frustration.
CLAN
发表于 2025-3-24 00:39:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71434-5ence — the resurrected soul awakening from the toils of mortality into eternal life. They call it their ‘child’ — a cold and marmoreal celebration of immortality, pure spirit freed from all entanglement with the ugliness and the dirt of existence, and immaculate in every aspect of its conception.
短程旅游
发表于 2025-3-24 04:47:58
Maxime Amblard,Michel Musiol,Manuel Rebuschilmers’s conduct. But Freud and Otto Rank notwithstanding, modern psychiatry has very little to add to Krafft-Ebing’s bafflement in the face of incest behaviour. and even less to Ibsen’s ‘poetical’ understanding of a syndrome which, of course, finds no analogies in the standard textbooks on the subje
中国纪念碑
发表于 2025-3-24 07:32:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1027/102699/102699_16.png
誓言
发表于 2025-3-24 12:27:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1027/102699/102699_17.png
野蛮
发表于 2025-3-24 16:57:59
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70451-3ted — but they also acknowledge the fact that the topic is already over fifty years old. E. M. Forster’s essay ‘Ibsen the Romantic’ first appeared in 1928, with its image of the dramatist as a ‘boy bewitched’ (side-whiskers, irritability and all) by a primeval romanticism lurking in the ‘strange gna
天真
发表于 2025-3-24 23:04:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1027/102699/102699_19.png
Opponent
发表于 2025-3-24 23:14:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71434-5 beacause we know next to nothing of her psychic life. Hedda’s history is predominantly social — a fully dramatised image of a . aristocrat for whom Gablerism is a code of obligations heaped by nobility upon her nature, and who lives in a world where people no longer do ‘that sort of thing’. But as