EXULT
发表于 2025-3-26 22:31:50
Shiel, Stenbock, Gilchrist, and Machen,hetic distinctions can lead to weird fiction being a conscious attempt at achieving literary respectability, free of the (to some) problematically déclassé implications of popular genres such as horror. He also looks at some other key contexts to the weird fiction of this period, including orientalism and the arabesque.
Dislocation
发表于 2025-3-27 02:42:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_32.png
Solace
发表于 2025-3-27 05:21:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_33.png
AVERT
发表于 2025-3-27 13:25:04
and Pulp Decadence,ge of Modernism. Underlying this discussion, and concluding a structural theme of the entire thesis, is a consideration of canonicity, and of the polluting of neat boundaries between notions of high and low culture.
magnanimity
发表于 2025-3-27 17:07:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_35.png
misanthrope
发表于 2025-3-27 20:46:02
Introduction,ird, and its crossovers with contemporary cultural theory and philosophy. Grounding the period focus of the book in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, he then provides a genealogy/etymology of the literary applications of the word ‘weird’ across that period.
arboretum
发表于 2025-3-28 00:12:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_37.png
Obligatory
发表于 2025-3-28 03:04:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_38.png
Bureaucracy
发表于 2025-3-28 07:43:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_39.png
Budget
发表于 2025-3-28 14:06:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10221/1022013/1022013_40.png