iodides
发表于 2025-3-23 10:26:16
Gustavo Rossi,Daniel Schwabeand Moore, have become standard fare in contemporary philosophy. In this introduc tion, I shall call attention to the close connection between some of Twardowski‘s main ideas and the corresponding thoughts of these four philosophers. 1. IDEAS AND THEIR INTENTIONS Twardowski‘s main contention is clear. He cla978-90-247-1926-6978-94-010-1050-4
革新
发表于 2025-3-23 14:42:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10216/1021504/1021504_12.png
grandiose
发表于 2025-3-23 18:49:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10216/1021504/1021504_13.png
留恋
发表于 2025-3-24 00:35:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10216/1021504/1021504_14.png
LAITY
发表于 2025-3-24 02:21:08
Geert-Jan Houben,Kees van der Sluijs,Peter Barna,Jeen Broekstra,Sven Casteleyn,Zoltàn Fiala,Flavius artial dif ferential equations, asymptotic analysis, numerical computation, and experimental science. The workshop brought together researchers from several disciplines, includ ing mathematics, physics, and both experimental and theoretical materials science.
露天历史剧
发表于 2025-3-24 09:08:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10216/1021504/1021504_16.png
FLIP
发表于 2025-3-24 13:53:03
Nathalie Moreno,José Raúl Romero,Antonio Vallecilloording to Nehring, languish in the basement of the local library, “where they’ll sit—with zero date stamps—until released gratis one fine Sunday morning to a used bookstore that, in turn, will sell them for a buck to a college student who’ll place them next to his dorm bed and dump them in an end-of
hemoglobin
发表于 2025-3-24 18:12:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10216/1021504/1021504_18.png
FLAGR
发表于 2025-3-24 20:44:44
Emilia Mendes than self-absorption: “As if the only possible reason for a woman to publicly reveal herself could be self-therapeutic. As if the point was not to reveal the circumstances of one’s own objectification” (221). When I teach the memoir . by Nancy Mairs, I approach the lectern equipped with passages li
Ganglion
发表于 2025-3-25 00:11:38
Emilia Mendes-basis in .., is a consequence of the following general (and surprising!) result. Recall that a .-form .: . → . of an .-free .-algebra . is an .-linear map fulfilling .(.’) = .(.’a) for any .’ ∈ . and inducing an .-module isomorphism . ≅ Hom.(.) which maps a ∈ . on the .-form mapping .’ ∈ . on .(.’)