MAUVE
发表于 2025-3-23 11:24:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10206/1020507/1020507_11.png
类似思想
发表于 2025-3-23 17:01:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10206/1020507/1020507_12.png
额外的事
发表于 2025-3-23 18:22:17
Robert J. Knechtexcluded middle: For every sentence ., . ⋁ ⌝. is true. Based on this law of classical logic one can prove that ∃.(.) by showing that its negation leads to a contradiction without providing any hint as to how to find an . Satisfying .. Similarly, one can prove ⌝ (⌝. ⋁ . by proving ⌝(⌝. ⋀ ⌝.) without
MUT
发表于 2025-3-24 01:41:10
Henry J. Cohntree.) A node on a tree may have one or more incomparable immediate successors. If it has more than one, we say the tree branches at that node. If each node has at most . immediate successors, the tree is .-ary or .-branching. (The one in the picture is a 2-ary, or as we usually say, a . tree.) A te
Prognosis
发表于 2025-3-24 02:47:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10206/1020507/1020507_15.png
松果
发表于 2025-3-24 10:10:39
r . ≥ 1 there is a language .. over a two-letter alphabet, such that .. can be recognized by an NBW with 2. + 1 states, whereas the minimal NCW that recognizes .. has 3. states. Even though this gap is not asymptotically very significant, it nonetheless demonstrates for the first time that NBWs are
FELON
发表于 2025-3-24 14:05:07
J. R. Halee, type examination is needed in these situations only for the first of the two purposes described and even here a careful preprocessing can considerably reduce their runtime footprint. We develop a scheme for treating types in these contexts that exploits this observation. Under this scheme, type i
窒息
发表于 2025-3-24 16:14:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10206/1020507/1020507_18.png
CARE
发表于 2025-3-24 20:05:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10206/1020507/1020507_19.png
AVID
发表于 2025-3-25 02:28:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10206/1020507/1020507_20.png