商业上
发表于 2025-3-25 03:38:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020496/1020496_21.png
出没
发表于 2025-3-25 09:29:57
The Cost of War, M. Russett). Starting with Smith and going on to Keynes, Einaudi, Pigou and many others, at various times the question was asked as to what was the best way to pay for the war: taxation, indebtedness, printing banknotes. Some economists even checked who, in the end, bore the costs of wars in reality.
Synapse
发表于 2025-3-25 14:17:56
Imperialism, on imperialism and those of Marx on war and, with different interpretations, saw that capitalism, in its monopolistic and imperialist version, caused the continuance of armed conflict. The text examines the interpretations of Hilferding, Rosa Luxemburg, Kautsky, Bukharin and Lenin.
TSH582
发表于 2025-3-25 16:20:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020496/1020496_24.png
你不公正
发表于 2025-3-25 22:42:10
Book 2020 and on the well-being of citizens. ..Examining interpretations from Smith, Hobson, Keynes, Kalecki, Stiglitz and many more, this important volume addresses the economic implications of war from the perspectives of many who bore the costs of wars in reality..
Bravura
发表于 2025-3-26 01:11:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020496/1020496_26.png
思想灵活
发表于 2025-3-26 07:10:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020496/1020496_27.png
Gossamer
发表于 2025-3-26 11:01:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020496/1020496_28.png
庇护
发表于 2025-3-26 15:16:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020496/1020496_29.png
熟练
发表于 2025-3-26 18:38:12
Economic Rationality or Irrelevance of War?,hematical bounds, suitable for the study of any war from the Punic Wars to the World Wars. They calculated strategic gambits and suggested deterrents as the basic factor in avoiding new devastating conflicts. The School of Public Choice maintains that the choice of war can be rational and thinks tha