磨碎
发表于 2025-3-30 08:51:29
Ideology in the Act of Meaning,afunctions. The analysis shows that with the category . comes a semantic configuration in which the agency of the belligerents is obscured, the specific details of the violence are vague and ambiguous, and the highly abstract elaborated code of military theory is a covert prosody in the text. These
EXCEL
发表于 2025-3-30 14:23:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020473/1020473_52.png
小说
发表于 2025-3-30 17:16:34
A Counter-Ideology: War as Violence,on of Iraq presented in the previous chapter. In this news article, written by veteran foreign correspondent Robert Fisk, the invasion is characterised not as . but as .. With the lexical item . comes a very different clusters of semantic features. The actions of the belligerents are construed as hi
慢跑鞋
发表于 2025-3-30 21:01:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020473/1020473_54.png
eucalyptus
发表于 2025-3-31 01:40:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10205/1020473/1020473_55.png
步履蹒跚
发表于 2025-3-31 06:40:35
Language in the Legitimation of War,ith our parallel condemnation of it. The linguistic patterns affirming war are tightly woven. War is supported by the highly elaborate linguistic infrastructure of the lexical item ., highly elaborated military discourses, and a highly elaborated international legal infrastructure. By comparison, re