暂时过来
发表于 2025-3-28 16:27:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10201/1020020/1020020_41.png
时间等
发表于 2025-3-28 19:32:42
David Miller (see ). Table 1 shows examples of the simplest 2-thioxo-l,3-dithioles divided in classes: Class O contains compounds without additional heteroatoms; Class 1 contains compounds with a sulfur heteroatom in an additional ring or chain; Class 2 contains compounds with a nitrogen heteroatom in an ad
grenade
发表于 2025-3-29 00:57:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10201/1020020/1020020_43.png
单调女
发表于 2025-3-29 05:30:15
David Miller universe? Is it the case that these texts safely contain the Lucretian message, or is there a surplus that threatens Christian orthodoxy? What degree of anxiety, or indeed illicit sense of liberation, is involved in imitating Lucretius’s gospel of rationalist materialism?
Abnormal
发表于 2025-3-29 10:13:02
David Milleror to “go beyond the barrier” of sound constitutional equilibrium of liberty and order is the necessary outgrowth of theoretical abstraction unhinged from the practicalities of political life. Ultimately for Burke, an “untempered spirit of madness, blindness, immorality, and impiety” defines the rev
Digest
发表于 2025-3-29 13:47:20
David Milleru den gegebenen Formänderungen einfach die zugehörigen Spannungen zu nehmen sind. Umgekehrt kann man (wenigstens, wenn man zeitliche Wirkungen ausschließt) aus einem Biegungsversuch bzw. Torsionsversuch der gekennzeichneten Art das elementare Formänderungsgesetz herleiten.
agnostic
发表于 2025-3-29 18:35:30
David Milleringuists such as Hall jr. and Hockett but by the very founder of American linguistics, Leonard Bloomfield. ., 1933 (pp. 27, 74–75, 138–59) was well aware of the difficulties in studying meaning, but he knew that formal description was not possible without recourse to the criterion of the semantic di
PAN
发表于 2025-3-29 20:25:11
David Miller too impatient to explain in full his earlier solutions, often merely referring to them casually as it were ina shorthand notation. For one important instance, in The Brown Book, Wittgenstein had explained in some detail what name-object relationships amount to in his view. There he offers both an explanation978-0-7923-4280-9978-1-4020-4109-9
Iatrogenic
发表于 2025-3-30 03:05:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10201/1020020/1020020_49.png
AIL
发表于 2025-3-30 04:23:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/103/10201/1020020/1020020_50.png