Sciatica
发表于 2025-3-25 04:02:59
978-3-030-89923-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
overweight
发表于 2025-3-25 09:25:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1014/101363/101363_22.png
代理人
发表于 2025-3-25 13:00:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92213-8process of the rehabilitation of the hypotheses following the age of Newton, which was characterized by the polemic against Descartes’ “esprit de système” and by a strictly inductive interpretation of the scientific method. The oblivion into which the methodology of the . fell is somewhat paradoxica
Introvert
发表于 2025-3-25 16:02:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92213-8s he was able to retrace our cognition to the origin of phenomena instead of delivering a “merely logical deduction”. Eberhard holds that there was nothing new, but all delivered in Leibniz and Wolff; to prove his claim he refers to a quote from Du Châtelet, taken from a paragraph where she determin
intrude
发表于 2025-3-25 23:50:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1014/101363/101363_25.png
SOBER
发表于 2025-3-26 03:19:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92617-4I argue that Du Châtelet advances Leibniz’s concept of time by explaining how we form the idea of time in our mind and how time as an ideal being relates to succession in real beings. I show that Du Châtelet, differently to Kant, recognizes the dependency of time in its constitution on succession in
choleretic
发表于 2025-3-26 05:02:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1014/101363/101363_27.png
Recessive
发表于 2025-3-26 11:16:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1014/101363/101363_28.png
Fretful
发表于 2025-3-26 14:06:32
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92622-8igm emerged as a counterargument to the Cartesian tradition of philosophy and science (Leibniz included), and it was first restricted to the English islands. In the beginning of the eighteenth century, Newtonians were also spoken of on the European continent, among them Pierre Louis Moreau de Mauper
medium
发表于 2025-3-26 20:11:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93285-4e emphasized the importance of causality to Du Châtelet’s .. Others, such as Stan (2019), have argued for a strong Wolffian influence on the latter, challenging the “received” narrative that reads Du Châtelet as a Leibnizian. In this paper, I will trace Du Châtelet’s conception of causality back to