教条
发表于 2025-3-21 19:17:52
书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>书目名称(Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0100079<br><br> <br><br>
TSH582
发表于 2025-3-21 20:41:59
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/012/image/100079.jpg
placebo
发表于 2025-3-22 00:49:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100079/100079_3.png
mettlesome
发表于 2025-3-22 07:27:36
978-1-4020-1327-0Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003
Fretful
发表于 2025-3-22 11:52:14
Wolfgang Banzhaf,Jens Ziegler,Jan T. Kimhly revered and so mightily condemned. Rarely has a philosopher been so acclaimed, both within the philosophical community and outside, in the intellectual community at large. And rarely has a philosopher been so widely interpreted.
无意
发表于 2025-3-22 14:20:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100079/100079_6.png
Aspiration
发表于 2025-3-22 17:07:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100079/100079_7.png
代替
发表于 2025-3-23 00:48:20
Florian Wodlei,Véronique Pimientaditional metaphysics of centuries-old philosophical theories were nonsense. Yes, it calls upon us to keep silent on matters that cannot be spoken of. Yes, it limits, and then talks about the limits, of our language — purporting to leave outside language talk which is seemingly metaphysical. And yes,
Microaneurysm
发表于 2025-3-23 02:48:20
Florian Wodlei,Véronique Pimienta of readings (of the ., and with a chronological addition — the emergence of a second, or later, Wittgenstein now to be interpreted along with, but very differently from, the first. This second station would seem to cover almost all of the standard readings of Wittgenstein; especially if an internal
的染料
发表于 2025-3-23 08:14:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57711-1ation. This should actually be qualified: there was nowhere left to go in the grand plan of early Wittgenstein . and later Wittgenstein ., with the middle Wittgenstein sometimes playing a part in explication of the move between them. True, several additional volumes of the . were constantly being br