认为
发表于 2025-3-25 06:21:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_21.png
键琴
发表于 2025-3-25 07:35:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_22.png
贵族
发表于 2025-3-25 12:39:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_23.png
一回合
发表于 2025-3-25 18:14:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_24.png
注入
发表于 2025-3-25 22:45:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_25.png
低三下四之人
发表于 2025-3-26 02:19:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_26.png
Acumen
发表于 2025-3-26 06:00:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_27.png
Feature
发表于 2025-3-26 12:32:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_28.png
Hdl348
发表于 2025-3-26 14:53:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/11/1001/100061/100061_29.png
厨师
发表于 2025-3-26 19:47:31
Not Everything Is Normativity: A Critique to Plunkett and Shapiro’s Account of General Jurisprudence’s proposal. Contrary to what they think, their account does not illuminate existing positions in general jurisprudence and cannot be used by legal scholars to advance the philosophical discussion in some important respects about legal thought, talk, and what, if any, such thought and talk are about.